i place this to mark the current paradigm and cutting edge understanding of the world-wide scientific standard model as of 2025
-
"I think that I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics. What I am going to tell you about is what we teach our physics students in the third or fourth year of graduate school... It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it. You see my physics students don't understand it... That is because I don't understand it. Nobody does."
-richard feynman"the first law of motion is also called the law of inertia.
the law of inertia is based on experiments by Galileo Galilei. Figure 6.18 illustrates the basic setup of his experiments
a block is released from rest from the same height on the slope, but as friction on the horizontal board is reduced, the block goes farther and farther before coming to rest.
he concluded that if there was no friction, the block would continue to move with uniform velocity forever.
that, in essence is the first law of motion.
figure 6.18. A block is released at rest from the same place each time so that when the block is at the bottom of the ramp, it has the same speed. when the track is polished, reducing friction, the block goes farther before coming to rest.
you may be wondering:
'What propels objects at constant velocity to be in a perpetual motion if no force were to act?'
There is really no answer to this question.
instead, we assert that nature has an inherent tendency of maintaining the motion. We give this natural tendency a name - the inertia of motion.
But beware that giving a name is not the same thing as having an explanation!formally, the observation by Galileo was made with respect to a frame which itself is at rest with respect to the incline and the horizontal board on which motion occurs. Actually, he would have noticed the same result had he observed the ball from a car moving at constant velocity.if we imagine a “truly at-rest frame”, say at the “center of the universe”, then any frame that does not accelerate with respect to this imagined frame will give us the same result. These frames are called inertial frames. Although physics can be done with respect to any frame, we will mostly write our formulas with respect to inertial frames."
-https://www.physicsbootcamp.org/forces-First-Law-of-Motion.html-
8/23/2025
----
as of right now, the professed study of cause and effect has no mechanism of action, can't explain its first law of motion, or the mechanical axis of the wheelthe current frontier of physics is a field of competing, overlapping frameworks aiming to reconcile quantum mechanics, gravitation, and spacetime including:
string theory/M‑theory, loop quantum gravity, asymptotic safety, holography (AdS/CFT & emergent spacetime), and causal dynamical triangulations.-INTRODUCING THE ERROR
The standard model reifies effects, abstracts measurements, and ignores cause.dialectical materialism does not accurately model mechanical systems, including ontological reality.philosophy applied to empirical ontology becomes systems analysis. the study of wholes, parts, forces, principles & attributes, causes & effects, order of operation and measurement of inputs & outputs, and the work done by what, upon what, causing what for how long.dialectical materialism impose, defend, and build the frame
name a wave and ignore what's waving
modern physics is stacking abstraction on top of abstractionreification x reification=abstraction blackhole
the mathematical trick of dialectics is to observe an effect; reify the effect; and ascribe the reification causal properties.while that attribution error does not change the material count of a system for a single snapshot, it voids the mechanics of the model completely. the two narratives are quantitatively identical but the dialectical is mechanically wrong.einstein popularized the practice in physics by reifying space, time, and waves; and even though he tried to reverse his error, modern physmath was born and hooked on the shortcut.since 1905 physmath has continued to fake-solve its mechanical problems with more reifications that touch without touching: virtual particles, wavefunctions, lines of force, observation, dark matter, quantum fluid, and more.
they don't know why "entanglement" happens, what a "wavefunction" really is. quantum theory is just really fancy statistical bookkeeping for a system they don't actually understand.
measuring behaviors does not explain causation
-
while current quantum physics has measured with great accuracy forces, they cannot and do not claim to explain any of the fundamentals of the cosmos, including matter, energy, light, conservation of energy, gravity, three bodies in orbit, magnetism, "spooky" action at a distance.
now we can, and
now we can get back to winning
